Discover & Read Articles Without Distractions

Find and explore trending articles from around the web in a clutter-free reading mode.

Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features
  • Articles Tagged with "Constitutional Law"

    Doctrine of reasonable classification - iPleaders

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article provides a comprehensive explanation of the doctrine of reasonable classification in Indian constitutional law, outlining its concept, scope, and significance.

    Justice Nariman's Revival Of Doctrine Of "Manifest Arbitrariness" To Strike Down Legislation

    livelaw.in Law India

    Justice Nariman's revival of the doctrine of 'manifest arbitrariness' has significantly impacted Indian constitutional law, leading to the striking down of several legislative provisions deemed unreasonable or discriminatory.

    Writ Courts Can Suo Motu Strike Down Subordinate Legislation : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India affirmed the power of Writ Courts to strike down subordinate legislation violating fundamental rights, even suo motu, but cautioned against its frequent use.

    ¿Realmente es posible destituir a un presidente en Costa Rica? Esto dice la ley | El Financiero

    elfinancierocr.com Politics Costa Rica

    The article discusses the legal possibilities of removing a president from office in Costa Rica, highlighting the lack of an impeachment process and the limited provision for removal due to mental or physical incapacity.

    The Supreme Court case that seeks to make everyone’s health insurance worse, Kennedy v. Braidwood Management | Vox

    vox.com Law United States

    The Supreme Court case, Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, challenges the Department of Health and Human Services' authority to mandate preventative health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, potentially impacting access to crucial treatments.

    Opinion: In the U.S., defying the courts is a constitutional crisis. In Canada, it’s a simple matter of paperwork - The Globe and Mail

    theglobeandmail.com Politics World

    The article contrasts the US's constitutional crisis over court defiance with Canada's use of the notwithstanding clause, highlighting Pierre Poilievre's intention to utilize it.

    Refusal to implement the Waqf Act is unconstitutional, untenable: Rijiju - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Politics India

    Union Minister Kiren Rijiju asserts that non-implementation of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, is unconstitutional, criticizing state governments that refuse to comply.

    Supreme Court Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett are likely to rescue Obamacare, in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management | Vox

    vox.com Law World

    The Supreme Court heard arguments in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, a case challenging the authority of the US Preventive Services Task Force to mandate preventative care coverage under the Affordable Care Act, with Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett seemingly leaning against dismantling the Task Force.

    US supreme court hears challenge to Obamacare free preventive healthcare | US supreme court | The Guardian

    theguardian.com Law US

    The US Supreme Court heard arguments on a case challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's free preventive healthcare services.

    Federal election 2025: Peter Dutton’s gas reservation plan unconstitutional, legal experts say

    smh.com.au Politics Australia

    Legal experts claim Peter Dutton's proposed gas reservation plan is unconstitutional, potentially leading to a legal battle if the Coalition wins the 2025 election.

    Fundamental duties - iPleaders

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article comprehensively explores the fundamental duties enshrined in the Indian Constitution, tracing their origin, scope, and significance in legal interpretations.

    Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala : case analysis

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article analyzes the landmark Indian Supreme Court case, Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala, focusing on the conflict between the fundamental right to freedom of religion and the duty to respect the National Anthem.

    The Supreme Court will soon decide whether to weaken the judges holding back Trump | Vox

    vox.com Law World

    The Supreme Court will decide whether to limit nationwide injunctions, using a case challenging Trump's unconstitutional attempt to revoke birthright citizenship as a test case.

    Stephen Miller says White House is ‘actively looking at’ suspending habeas corpus | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Politics United States

    Stephen Miller revealed the Trump administration's consideration of suspending habeas corpus, a legal procedure allowing challenges to government detention, raising concerns about due process for migrants.

    What is habeas corpus, the legal procedure Trump is considering suspending? | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Law United States

    President Trump's consideration of suspending habeas corpus, a fundamental legal right, has sparked debate about its implications for immigration and civil liberties.

    President Murmu asks Supreme Court whether timelines can be ‘imposed’ on President, Governors to clear State Bills - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Law India

    President Murmu has referred fourteen questions to the Supreme Court regarding the timelines for presidential and gubernatorial assent to state bills, seeking clarification on the court's powers to impose such timelines.

    'Constitutional Challenge Can Be Addressed Before High Court': Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Provisions Of GST Act

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea challenging the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, directing the petitioner to pursue the matter in the High Court.

    T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. (2002) - iPleaders

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article provides a detailed analysis of the landmark Supreme Court case, T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. (2002), focusing on minority educational institutions' rights in India.

    Kristi Noem Is Dangerously Ignorant - The Atlantic

    theatlantic.com Politics United States

    The article critiques Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's apparent lack of understanding of fundamental constitutional rights, highlighting the dangers of such ignorance in a position of power.

    Habeas corpus: The Trump administration is eyeing an alarming way to stop the courts from blocking their plans.

    slate.com Politics World

    The Trump administration's consideration of suspending habeas corpus to circumvent judicial oversight of its deportation policies raises serious constitutional concerns.

    The Supreme Court’s Inconsistency Is Very Revealing - The Atlantic

    theatlantic.com Law United States

    The Supreme Court's inconsistent application of legal principles, particularly regarding presidential removal power and abortion rights, raises concerns about its commitment to neutrality and the rule of law.